Sunday, April 1, 2012

Reading John Green's "The Fault in Our Stars"

As the tide washed in, the Dutch Tulip Man faced the Ocean: 
'Conjoiner rejoinder poisoner concealer revelator. Look at it, rising up and rising down, taking everything with it.

     'What’s that?' Anna asked. 

     'Water,' the Dutchman said. 'Well, and time.'
           -Peter Van Houten, An Imperial Affliction

This epigraph hooked me immediately. John Green, following in the footsteps of F. Scott Fitzgerald's "The Great Gatsby," decided to begin his novel with a quote from a fictional text. By fictional I mean, "An Imperial Affliction" does not exist. Well, it does, though .... inside "The Fault in Our Stars." Hooked yet?

I read John Green's "The Fault in Our Stars" (TFiOS) a few weeks ago, and I must say, I can't stop thinking about this book. I had started "The Hunger Games" (along with a bazillion other people) and was instantly horrified by the concept. I was not horrified by the commentary offered by the novel--I was horrified by the obsession with the violence depicted in the novels. I was horrified by the truth it suggests about modern culture. "The Hunger Games" ... as a film ... is simply ironic for me. The book is a critique on our desire to to bathe in blood and violence, yet the film acts out the book in a way that abandons the commentary and simply performs, leaving us to become, once again, members of an audience, cheering for those in the arena. (More on this thinking in a future post.)


Back to TFiOS. I can't stop thinking about Hazel and her profound, intellectual approaches to her situation. Hazel, 16, the novel's narrator, is fighting and slowly losing her battle with cancer. As a narrator, Hazel has the ability to transfer her fears to the reader. She reminds me of Hamlet in many ways. There are speeches within the text that echo the existential soliloquies of Hamlet. However, I find Hazel far braver than the Dark Prince of Denmark. Hazel desperately wants to live her life, to explore the beauty of a world with boundless experiences, even though she is deeply aware of her own finite amount of time here to explore those experiences. 


“There will come a time when all of us are dead. All of us. There will come a time when there are no human beings remaining to remember that anyone ever existed or that our species ever did anything. There will be no one left to remember Aristotle or Cleopatra, let alone you. Everything that we did and built and wrote and thought and discovered will be forgotten and all of this will have been for naught. Maybe that time is coming soon and maybe it is millions of years away, but even if we survive the collapse of our sun, we will not survive forever. There was time before organisms experienced consciousness, and there will be time after. And if the inevitability of human oblivion worries you, I encourage you to ignore it. God knows that’s what everyone else does.” 



In allusion to Shakespeare's "Julius Caesar," Green adapts his title from lines delivered by Cassius to Brutus, "Men at some time are masters of their fates: / The fault, dear Brutus, is not in our stars, / But in ourselves, that we are underlings" (I.ii). I guess the question is, What happens when we are absolutely, profoundly, NOT masters of our own fate?


I can't stand spoilers ... and I do not want to ruin a great book, but I can say, there is a love story here. The story of Hazel and Gus set against the stark reality of cancer moves me. This book has me re-examining my own relationships, my perspectives on life and death, and the realities faced by young people every day. 


Here is John Green reading the first chapter. 






I look forward to your comments. 














9 comments:

  1. Wow, that excerpt was very moving. I want to read this. I suppose The Hunger Games is popular because of that bread-and-circus approach to life we all have, at times, that sickly, see-an-accident-and-can't-look-away phenom. And we should rise above that. Because there is so much more beauty to behold. Great post!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you, Larissa. I hope you get a chance to read TFiOS. I just added a video of John G. reading chapter one aloud.

      Also, I need to sit down and write down my reactions to the Hunger Games. I just keep coming back to thoughts in response to the concept book, and very few reactions to the book itself.

      I hope to get this blog up and running again. I just need to realize, not every post needs to be 15,000 words. Thanks for reading and commenting!

      Delete
  2. hi,
    could you explain this qoute:
    'What’s that? 'Anna asked. - does "that" refer to "it" or to "everything"?
    in other words, does it mean that water (and time) takes everyhing with it,
    or that the (rising of) the ocean takes the water and time with it?
    thanks a lot in advance!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for the comment. And ... your question is very interesting. As the Dutch Tulip Man faces the ocean, I think he is watching ocean and thinking of its metaphorical resonances. Augustus has similar thoughts all the time in TFiOS. The ocean, as part of the water motif is present throughout the book. I think John Green explores the way water gives life and can take life away. Consider, Anna's "cancer water" is drained from her lungs, Augustus's Last name, the fact that Amsterdam is so closely connected to water.

      I also think there is a sense of the inevitable and the immutable in the quote. Like fate, an ultimate fate, it just simply "is."

      I also think the "Look at it" portion can be paraphrased to mean "Consider it." or "Think about it."

      This is how I understand the quote.

      JD McClatchey has a great poem, "Resignation," which reminds me of the Dutch Tulip Man's quote. The poem is about trees, but it's metaphorical resonances are much deeper.

      I hope this helps.

      Delete
  3. hi Dan, thank you very much for the beautiful answer. i'm sure i'll be able to appreciate it better once i've read all the book, because i've just begun. my english isn't my mother's tounge. please forgive me if i still try to get a very simple answer, cause i'm not sure i understand.

    which of the two paraphrases would be more accurate:
    1. it is rising up and down, taking everything with it.
    - what do you mean? who is doing that? (who is "it"?)
    - the water. and time.

    2. it is rising up and down, taking everything with it.
    - taking what?
    - taking the water. and time.

    if you actaually answered it already, i appologize... it's important for me to get the precise meaning. or do you say that it is ambiguous and can be read both ways? (i hope not...)
    thanks again for all your help!

    ReplyDelete
  4. which of the two paraphrases would be more accurate:
    1. it is rising up and down, taking everything with it.
    - what do you mean? who is doing that? (who is "it"?)
    - the water. and time.

    I think the ocean is a symbol. The ocean rises up and down taking everything with and, AND times absolutely takes everything with it.
    "It" is water and "it" is time. For example, no matter hard hard we fight against time, time wins, right? Time is a "Conjoiner rejoinder poisoner concealer revelator." The ocean or water as an element is a "Conjoiner rejoinder poisoner concealer revelator." As the D. T. Man looks out, he is thinking deeply about the complexities of life.

    2. it is rising up and down, taking everything with it.
    - taking what?
    - taking the water. and time.

    Time takes everything away ... at some point because we are mortal. Water can take everything away because it is a part of who we are, our physical bodies--our blood, our minds, etc. I think the quote comes back to the ide I said above. "It," again, is both water and time. And it takes away everything, life and existence. When you read the book, pay attention of Gus's "I fear oblivion" speech. Gus knows that all we have ever known will one day pass on, will be taken away by time.

    Helps?

    I love your questions. I hope to hear from you about other books, as well.

    ReplyDelete
  5. it helps, thanks very much and all the best!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Now I want to reread the book. ;)

    ReplyDelete
  7. This an author I have been wanting to check out and I have read some stunning reviews on this, so obviously I am missing out, thanks for reminding me to be this sooner than later!

    regards,
    dwayne of Tony Lama Boots

    ReplyDelete